Critics of Organic Content Farms like Demand Media Should Eat Their Own Words
A year ago, I stuck my neck out and defended Demand Media’s approach to developing great content down on the content farm. Last week, I felt vindicated when Demand Media reported financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and raised its previously issued fiscal 2012 financial guidance.
Richard Rosenblatt, Chairman and CEO of Demand Media, in a press release, “We are pleased with our first quarter results and remain focused on investing in our long-term growth initiatives.” These include enhancing the quality of Demand Media’s Owned & Operated properties as well as expanding its content distribution channels and partnerships.
Demand Media: Success on Multiple Fronts
On a consolidated basis, Demand Media ranked as a top 20 US web property throughout the first quarter of 2012, ranking as #18 in March 2012, according to comScore. Demand Media’s worldwide unique users exceeded 104 million in March 2012.- On a standalone basis, eHow.com ranked as the #17 website in the US in March 2012, up from #19 in July 2011.
- LIVESTRONG.COM/eHow Health continued to rank as the #3 Health property in the US based on unique visits throughout the first quarter of 2012. In May 2012, LIVESTRONG.COM won the People’s Voice Webby award for Health Websites.
- Cracked.com continued its ranking as the most visited humor site in the US throughout the first quarter of 2012, and more time was spent on the site than any other humor website. In May 2012, Cracked.com won the People’s Voice Webby award for Humor Websites.
- In February 2012, Demand Media introduced its innovative Social Feed ads, which allow advertisers to deliver customized social media content directly into their live rich media ads.
- In March 2012, Demand Media launched the eHow.com Tech channel, with RadioShack as its lead sponsor, to help users master everyday tech-related tasks and projects.
- In April 2012, Demand Media launched eHow Pets, the third major channel in its partnership with YouTube.
Demand Media & YouTube = 7 Figure Revenue Success
Demand Media also has a number of YouTube channels, including Expert Village, eHow, LiveStrong, Cracked, Trails, Golflink, and TypeF. According to comScore Video Metrix YouTube partner data for February 2012, Demand Media had more than 6.8 million unique U.S. viewers, who watched over 17.4 million videos for an average of 9.5 minutes per viewer.
Demand Media has been a YouTube Partner since 2007, and by January 2009, advertising had become “a seven figure revenue stream,” according to Steven Kydd, EVP of Demand Studios, Demand Media’s content creation division. Today, Demand Media’s channels on YouTube had more than 2.8 billion total upload views:
- Expert Village’s channel has over 2.4 billion views.
eHow’s channel has 173.6 million views.- LiveStrong’s channel has 51.3 million views.
- eHow Espanol’s new channel already has 49.1 million views.
- eHow Dance’s new channel already has 29.8 million views.
- eHow Fitness’ new channel already has 23.8 million views.
- eHow Style’s new channel already has 17.3 million views.
- Cracked’s channel has 15.9 million views.
- eHow Food’s new channel already has 14.9 million views.
- eHow Tech’s new channel already has 14.2 million views.
- eHow Home’s new channel already has 9.2 million views.
- Golflink’s channel has 6.9 million views.
- Trails’s channel has 4.4 million views.
- eHow Pets’ new channel already has 2.5 million views.
- TypeF | Signature Series’ channel has 2.2 million views.
- eHow Money’s new channel already has 1.8 million views.
So, I think the critics of organic content farms like Demand Media should eat their own words.
What Exactly is a Content Farm?
These critics called Demand Media a “content farm,” like that’s inherently a bad thing. But, according to Wikipedia,
“In the context of the World Wide Web, a content farm (or content mill) is a company that employs large numbers of often freelance writers to generate large amounts of textual content which is specifically designed to satisfy algorithms for maximal retrieval by automated search engines.”
Using that definition, The Huffington Post – which was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in National Reporting last month – is also a content farm. Don’t believe me? Check out Clair Cain Miller article in The New York Times entitled, “Web Words That Lure the Readers.”
So, who exactly is harmed by companies that employ large numbers of “freelance” writers? And what is so bad about generating large amounts of content which is specifically designed to “lure” readers?
If you ask me, today’s critics of content farms are like the old critics of “yellow journalism.” Back in the 1880s and 1890s, Joseph Pulitzer hired women reporters like Nelly Bly, cut the price of the New York World to a penny, and added bolder headlines, more prominent illustrations, sports pages, women’s sections, personal advice columns, and comic strips. One comic strip featured a street urchin in a yellow shirt, and a hostile critic coined the term, “yellow journalism,” as a damning label for this kind of high-voltage content.
Today, virtually all newspapers have hired women reporters and adopted bold headlines, prominent illustrations, sports pages, women’s sections, personal advice columns, and comic strips. And they’d be honored if one of their text reporters, photographers, videographers, graphic artists, producers, or journalists won a Pulitzer Prize.
So, yesterday’s yellow journalism is today’s award-winning journalism.
“News” vs. Instructional “How-To” Content
So, why are journalists so afraid of content farms?
According to Google Insights for Search, web search interest in “news” has remained flat from 2004 to the present, while web search interest in “how to” has increased steadily. Most reporters, producers, and journalists are creating “news” stories while many freelance writers are creating “how to” articles.
And according to Compete PRO, eHow.com had 46.3 million unique visitors in March 2012, up 68.4% from 27.5 million in March 2010. By comparison, NYTimes.com had 16.8 million unique visitors in March 2012, down 5.6% from 17.8 million in March 2010.
So, I expect many of today’s critics of content farms will begin developing their own how-to content in the near future, start recruiting freelance writers to create it, or beat a path to Demand Media’s door to get their own Content Channels like USA TODAY’s “Travel Tips.” If they don’t, they’ll be yesterday’s news.
Read More...
ITC Awards Microsoft an Import Ban on Motorola Phones, Tablets
The Droid Razr Maxx and other Motorola devices face a U.S. import ban for violating a Microsoft patent. Photo: Jim Merithew/Wired 
The U.S. International Trade Commission awarded Microsoft what could be a significant patent victory on Friday by deciding that all of Motorola Mobility’s Android phones and tablets should face an American import ban.
The proposed ban, which was first reported by the website Foss Patents, is the result of a December ITC ruling that Motorola’s Android devices violate a Microsoft-owned patent — patent 6370566 — that pertains to “generating meeting requests and group scheduling from a mobile device.”
Essentially, Microsoft owns a patent on enabling a mobile device to give users “the ability to schedule a meeting request from the mobile device itself” by assigning the created meeting request, or “object,” by way of “a global identification number which uniquely identifies the object to other devices which encounter the object.”
The Obama administration has 60 days to review the ITC’s decision. If the government doesn’t overturn the ban, it will go into effect after the 60-day period is over. Motorola can get around the import ban by removing the feature from its devices or by reaching a patent licensing deal with Microsoft, as many other Android handset makers, such as Samsung, LG and HTC have done.
But, as HTC is discovering right now, software changes can still delay the shipment of new products as federal officials inspect devices to make sure they’re in the clear.
The ITC, which is made up of a six-member board of commissioners, also imposed a 33-cent levy on each device Motorola imports into the U.S. during the 60-day review period.
Motorola officials were unavailable for comment by press time. For its part, Microsoft said it attempted to strike a deal with Motorola before heading to the ITC with its complaint and is still open to a settlement of some sort.
“Microsoft sued Motorola in the ITC only after Motorola chose to refuse Microsoft’s efforts to renew a patent license for well over a year,” David Howard, Microsoft’s deputy general counsel and a corporate vice president, told Wired in an e-mail. “We’re pleased the full Commission agreed that Motorola has infringed Microsoft’s intellectual property, and we hope that now Motorola will be willing to join the vast majority of Android device makers selling phones in the US by taking a license to our patents.”
Tags: Cloud Hosting - Coding Web 3.0 - HD Video - Hi-Def Multimedia (HD) - HTML 5 - Multimedia and Video Platforms - Multimedia News - Music on The Web - Online Marketing - Open Source Software (OSS) - The Bleeding Edge of Tech - The Blog Roll - VlogRead More...
Amazon Pitching Kindle Fire Welcome-Screen Ads for $600K
Whether we like it or not, advertising pays for a bunch of stuff we enjoy. Network TV, magazines and web sites that don’t have multi-billion-dollar IPOs all depend on advertising dollars to make their profit margins — or even survive. And now Amazon is pondering an advertising subsidy for its Kindle Fire tablet.
Ad Age reports that Amazon has been pitching Kindle Fire welcome-screen ads to ad agency executives. For a paltry $600,000, companies can purchase an Amazon “Special Offers” ad to run for two months on the best-selling Android tablet around.
The agencies were unable to determine if the ads would be served to current Kindle Fires, or on an upcoming, subsidized Kindle Fire model. In the Ad Age report, one agency executive expressed concern that adding ads to the current Kindle Fire would upset owners: “You’re already paying a premium for the product and then having that unexpected ad experience makes for a worse consumer experience.”
It’s also unclear what exactly the welcome screen is on the Kindle Fire. Is it the lock screen? Or is it screen that appears when the Fire is started up?
Understandably, the ad agencies that spoke with Ad Age declined to sign up for the Amazon ad buy.
If Amazon is planning on an ad-supported Kindle Fire, the savings could be significant for consumers. Amazon has been selling ad-supported Kindle e-readers for a while now, offering hardware price reductions to consumers willing to suffer a few static ads. Ad-supported Kindles are on average approximately 30 percent cheaper than their ad-free counterparts. If Amazon were to knock 25 percent off of the price of the Kindle Fire, the tablet would sell for $150.
That is if Amazon can sell the ads.
Tags: Cloud Hosting - Coding Web 3.0 - HD Video - Hi-Def Multimedia (HD) - HTML 5 - Multimedia and Video Platforms - Multimedia News - Music on The Web - Online Marketing - Open Source Software (OSS) - The Bleeding Edge of Tech - The Blog Roll - VlogRead More...
Analysts Say Nokia Will Burn Through $2.5B by Year’s End
Curious about how to burn through $2.5 billion in less than a year? Nokia might have some suggestions. According to a Reuters poll of analysts, Nokia is on track to lose 2 billion euros, or $2.5 billion, of its cash pile in the next three quarters — after already losing $2.7 billion of its cash reserves in the past five quarters.
And that’s not even the most pessimistic of outlooks.
More bullish analysts predict that the Finnish mobile company will wipe out the entirety of its 4.9 billion euro, or $6.2 billion, cash pile by the end of 2012. It’s a worsening outlook for Nokia, which suffered a $1.7 billion loss in Q1. And less than a month ago, the once-largest mobile handset company lost its position to Samsung and had its bonds downgraded to “junk” status.
“I would not rule out the possibility of Nokia being downgraded further,” Nancy Utterback, credit strategist at Aviva Investors, told Reuters. “The company is in a negative spiral that will be hard to reverse.”
Nokia declined to comment on the poll’s findings.
There is, however, still hope for Nokia, according to the 30 banks and brokerages polled by Reuters. The poll found that, on average, analysts believe Nokia will end the year with an actual cash buffer, albeit a small one, of 2.9 billion euros, or $3.6 billion.
It’s a significant loss compared to the company’s 2007 cash pile of more than 10 billion euros, or $12.7 billion. But at least there’s a sliver of hope that Nokia can survive longer than a couple of years.
And Nokia still has the potential to bounce back with its Lumia line of smartphones and the growth of Microsoft’s Windows Phone platform. The polled analysts predict that Nokia will sell a total of 46 million smartphones next year, more than double the expected 20 million units for this year.
Tags: Cloud Hosting - Coding Web 3.0 - HD Video - Hi-Def Multimedia (HD) - HTML 5 - Multimedia and Video Platforms - Multimedia News - Music on The Web - Online Marketing - Open Source Software (OSS) - The Bleeding Edge of Tech - The Blog Roll - VlogRead More...
iPhonography Accessories: Which Gadgets Are Best?

By Alexander George. This article was originally published on The Wirecutter, a “list of great technology” curated by Wired alum Brian Lam.
The iPhone’s camera is good, but we spent a good amount of time searching for the best gear to make it better.
On top of the homework, we also spoke to some friends from Instagram, like Jessica Zollman, one of the original members of Instagram’s community team. And photographer Cole Rise, a designer of some of the filters (including the “rise” filter) and the Instagram app icon itself.
We started out with a list of a few dozen accessories, but since most of the value of the iPhone comes from its apps, there are very few accessories that will really improve your shots, and honestly, only the Olloclip — first up in our gallery, and described below — is the must-have device in this list. The rest are good, useful and novel, and if you have a specific need in mind, proven technology.
Read More...
Amazon Rumored to Be Readying a 10-Inch Kindle Fire
If rumors are to be believed, Apple and Amazon are both working on tablets that would invade each other’s turf. The latest scuttlebutt has Amazon preparing for a 10-inch Kindle Fire: DigiTimes reports that “market rumors” are pointing to a 10-inch Amazon tablet launching in the third quarter of this year.
While Amazon is notoriously tight lipped about its sales figures, the Kindle Fire has been pegged as the number one selling Android tablet on the market, with a 54 percent share among a vast field of competitors. With such a commanding lead, it makes sense that Amazon would set its sights on expanding the Fire line, and taking on the iPad in the 10-inch tablet market.
The irony, of course, is that Apple is rumored to be working on a 7-inch iPad mini. The smallish 7-inch form factor — once blasted by Steve Jobs as being dead-on-arrival — is actually doing quite well for Amazon’s Fire, and conventional wisdom says Apple is finding the prospect of lucrative 7-inch iPad sales too hard to ignore.
Both companies’ tablets support robust digital ecosystems that make money on their own. Apple makes a tidy profit on all its iPad sales, but also takes a 30 percent cut of all iOS app sales. And of course Apple makes money on iTunes movie, TV show and music sales as well.
Amazon, meanwhile, takes a different route: It doesn’t make any money on its rock-bottom-priced, $200 Kindle Fire, but recoups everything on the back end (and then some) via all the digital and physical goods it sells via the tablet, a veritable gateway drug to rampant consumerism. Thanks to this pricing model, the company could effectively subsidize a 10-inch Kindle Fire, selling it for cost at between $300 and $350. At this price, consumers could wave off the iPad and its heady $500 entry fee, and save a bit of cash.
Of course, the 7-inch Kindle Fire isn’t in the same league as the current 10-inch iPad in terms of performance, U.I. and available apps. So, if Apple were to release a 7-inch iPad, Amazon could find itself up against a true competitor in the mini-tablet space. Apple has shown that it can sell hardware at a premium price and still garner a healthy profit.
With each company allegedly looking to drink from the other’s milkshake, the tablet market could get very, very interesting by the end of the year.
Tags: Cloud Hosting - Coding Web 3.0 - HD Video - Hi-Def Multimedia (HD) - HTML 5 - Multimedia and Video Platforms - Multimedia News - Music on The Web - Online Marketing - Open Source Software (OSS) - The Bleeding Edge of Tech - The Blog Roll - VlogRead More...
Twitter Improves Privacy Options, Now Supports ‘Do Not Track’
Photo: Only Sequel/Flickr
Twitter has jumped on the “Do Not Track” privacy bandwagon.
The company recently confirmed that it supports the Do Not Track header, a user privacy tool originally created by Mozilla that is in the process of becoming a web standard. That means if you visit Twitter in any web browser that supports the Do Not Track header, you can opt out of the cookies Twitter uses to gather personal information, as well as any cookies set by third-party advertisers.
Behavioral tracking, as such practices are often called, is a common on the web. Advertisers use cookies to track your clicks, watching which sites you visit, what you buy and even, in the case of mobile browsers, where you go. Often the sites tracking you are not just the sites you’ve actually visited, but third-party sites running ads on those pages.
And it’s not just advertisers tracking your movements, social networks like Facebook and Twitter also follow you around the web. You may not realize it, but Twitter has been tracking your every move for some time. The company doesn’t make a secret of it either. In a blog post announcing Twitter’s new “tailored suggestions system” Twitters Othman Laraki writes, “we receive visit information when sites have integrated Twitter buttons or widgets.”
To be clear, not only is Twitter able to set cookies any time you visit its own domain, whenever you visit a website (like this one) with a “Tweet This” or similar button Twitter can see you there as well. This practice is hardly unique to Twitter; Facebook, Google+ and others are doing the same thing.
Most of the time the information gathered is used to create a better experience for users. In the case of Twitter’s new “tailored suggestions” feature the information is used to build a profile of what you like and then Twitter makes suggestions based on that profile. You can read about exactly what Twitter does with your info and how long it keeps it in the company’s privacy policy.
The problem with such tracking is that it’s necessary for features we want, like smart, targeted suggestions — new users to follow, music you’ll likely enjoy, books you might want to read and so on — but it can also be used for decidedly less friendly purposes. As awareness of the downsides to such tracking become more well known a growing number of people are opting out of the tracking. The Mozilla Privacy blog reports that “current adoption rates of Do Not Track are 8.6 percent for desktop users of Firefox and 19 percent for Firefox Mobile users.”
To take advantage of Twitter’s new Do Not Track feature you’ll need to be using a web browser that supports the header. Currently that means Firefox, Opera 12+, Internet Explorer 9+ or Safari 5.1+. Chrome has pledged to add support for Do Not Track, but doesn’t just yet. For more information on protecting your online privacy, including tools like Ghostery, which go even further, blocking all tracking cookies, see our earlier post, Secure Your Browser: Add-Ons to Stop Web Tracking.
Tags: Cloud Hosting - Coding Web 3.0 - HD Video - Hi-Def Multimedia (HD) - HTML 5 - Multimedia and Video Platforms - Multimedia News - Music on The Web - Online Marketing - Open Source Software (OSS) - The Bleeding Edge of Tech - The Blog Roll - VlogRead More...
Quick Course On Effective Website Copywriting
Many dismiss copywriting as something that ad agency people do. Truthfully, all of us need to pay close attention to copywriting if we want to achieve our business objectives.
The goal of a “regular” text is to inform or entertain. The goal of Web copy (and ideally your website in general) is to get people to do something—to sign up, make a purchase, or something similar. Hiring a professional copywriter can be very expensive, which is one of the reasons why this is a valuable skill to have yourself.
“I don’t need to learn copywriting, I write based on how it sounds to me.”
Think you don’t need to learn copywriting?
David Ogilvy, the father of modern advertising, addressed this in his book Ogilvy on Advertising. One of his copywriters told him that he had not read any books about advertising; he preferred to rely on his own intuition.
Ogilvy asked him: “Suppose your gallbladder has to be removed this evening. Will you choose a surgeon who has read some books on anatomy and knows where the gallbladder, is or someone who relies on his own intuition?”
What distinguishes top experts from mediocre players is that the best know more. You can write better copy if you know more about it.
The Process Of Writing Great Copy
Everything is easier with the right process. If your approach to copywriting is “I’ll just try to be convincing”, you’re setting yourself up for failure.
You don’t even need to be a “natural writer” to come up with excellent copy, you just need the right process and some key principles about writing copy that sells.
The best processes are simple, as those are the ones you actually use.
Here are the six steps of effective copywriting process:
- Research: customer, product and competition.
- Outline and guideposts.
- Draft copy.
- Conversion boost.
- Revise, rearrange.
- Test.
And now let’s get to the details:
1. Research
This is often the most time-intensive part of your copywriting.
“You don’t stand a tinker’s chance of producing successful advertising unless you start doing your homework. I have always found this extremely tedious, but there is no way around it.”
— David Ogilvy
David Ogilvy had the task to do copywriting for a Rolls Royce ad. He spent three weeks reading about it before he came up with the headline and the rest of the copy. While he was talking about advertising, it equally applies to your website copy—the goal is to get people to do something.

Ogilvy’s famous Rolls Royce ad.
You need to figure out why people buy the product, how they buy it, what they use it for, and what really matters to them. If you don’t have this figured out, you really cannot write a copy that works. When it’s your own business that you’re writing copy for, things go much faster, of course, as you know the product and the competition.
Gauge the Competition
You need to be aware of your direct competition, how they present their product, and what claims they seem to be making. If you are not selling something unique, you are selling as much for your competition as you are selling for yourself. Being “like” others or choosing to be “one of the leading providers of” is a losing strategy.
Neuromarketing research tells us that differentiating our claims is the key to talking to the old brain, the decision making part of our brain. Our whole business identity should be different from the competition, and the claims we’re making about our product should stand out.
Get Out of the Office
The answers are not in your office and you won’t have eureka-moments at brainstorming meetings (working solo is far more effective anyway). You have to interview people. Don’t waste time interviewing random people, you need to talk to your ideal customers and find out what’s on their minds.
Find out what they think about your kind of product, what language they use when they talk about it, what attributes are important to them, and what promises would most likely convince them to buy it. Pick the last 10 to 20 customers (who still remember their purchasing experiences), and ask them these questions (recording the interviews is a good idea, but ask for permission):
- Who are you? What do you do? (customer profile)
- What does our product help you do? (helps you understand how they use it, tells you words they use to describe our product)
- Which parameters did you compare on different options? (which features matter)
- What were the most important ones? (key pains to solve)
- Which alternatives did you consider? (competitors we have to look at)
- What made you choose our product? (our key advantage)
- What were the biggest hesitations and doubts before the purchase? (things we have to address in the copy)
- Were there questions you needed answers to, but couldn’t find any? (necessary information to provide)
- What information would have helped you make the decision faster? (same as above)
- In which words would you recommend it to somebody you know? (words they use to describe our product)
Take note of the exact wording they use. Your copy needs to match the conversation in your customer’s mind. If you talk about “scribing devices” and he needs a pen, there’s a mismatch.
My point is that when customers see the product described in words they have in their mind already, then you’ve got their attention.
2. Outline And Guideposts
Next step: write the outline. Guideposts are the markers that help you write the content.
Writing an outline usually only takes a few minutes and provides a road map for the rest of the project. It allows you to complete the work faster and ensures that you stick to the flow.
The outline structure will depend on the page you’re writing the copy for. The main pages you need a well thought-out copy in place are your home page and product pages.
Here are outline templates I personally use, and you can copy them. I’ve tweaked and tested them over the years, and this model works the best for me.
Home Page Copy
Your home page copy structure depends a lot on your business. A nail salon would have a different approach from an e-commerce store; a website selling mobile app design courses is different from a hosting company. Hence, it’s basically impossible for me to give you an outline template for your home page.
What IS universal is the value proposition. Every home page needs one (unless you’re a very well-known brand)
A value proposition is a promise of value to be delivered. It’s the primary reason a prospect should buy from you. The value proposition is usually a block of text with a visual.
There is no one right way to go about it, but I suggest you start with the following formula:
- Headline:
What is the end-benefit you’re offering, in one short sentence. Can mention the product and/or the customer. Attention grabber. - Sub-headline or a two-to-three sentence paragraph:
A specific explanation of what you do/offer, for whom, and why is it useful. - Bullet points:
List the key benefits or features.
Here’s a list of useful value proposition examples you can check out.
Product Page Copy Outline
Product page is where you sell the value of your product and where the user takes action (adds to cart, sign up, makes a purchase, etc.).
- Name of the product.
- Value proposition: what’s the end-benefit of this product and who is it for?
- Specific and clear overview of what the product does and why is that good (features and benefits).
- What’s the pain that it solves? Description of the problem.
- List of everything in the product (e.g. curriculum of the course, list of every item in the package, etc.).
- Technical information: parameters, what do you get and how does it work?
- Objection handling. Make a list of all possible FUDs (fears, uncertainties, doubts) and address them.
- Bonuses (what you get on top of the offer).
- Money-back guarantee (+ return policy).
- Price.
- Call to action.
- Expectation setting: what happens after you buy?
What you now have in place is like a skeleton. Next step would be to start writing the draft version of the copy by filling in the blanks.
3. Draft Copy
Start filling in the blanks in the template above, and keep these points in mind for the style of your writing.
Avoid Jargon and Blandvertising
The goal of the copy is to connect with the reader, and guide them towards an action.
“Human relationships are about communicating. Business jargon should be banished in favor of simple English. Simplicity is a sign of truth and a criterion of beauty. Complexity can be a way of hiding the truth.”
— Helena Rubinstein
Using complicated, fancy words does not make you seem any smarter or your solution any better—it just turns everybody off. Who wants to read something that doesn’t feel like it’s written for them? Talk to people like a real human. If you wouldn’t use a phrase on your website in a conversation with a customer, then don’t use it.
In addition to fancy words, avoid meaningless phrases. What do “on-demand marketing software”, “integrated solutions” or “flexible platform” really mean anyway?
Or useless phrases like “changing the way X is done”, “paradigm shifting …” or “exceeding customer expectations”—stop the nonsense. These bland phrases have long lost any meaning, and you will just waste precious attention time. You can see a list of the top 100 most overused buzzwords and marketing speak in press releases here.
Another thing to avoid—superlatives and hype. Saying things like “the best”, “world leader”, “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” will just ruin your integrity. People don’t believe such claims anyway (even if they’re true).
What to do instead? Be specific.
Be Specific
Specificity converts.
“Clearer and more specific subject lines convert better.”
— Bob Kemper, Senior Director of Sciences, MECLABS.
While in that specific quote Bob was focused on subject lines, this principle applies equally well to all copywriting. Specific is believable, specific is attractive, specific is convincing. Don’t be vague, be specific.
“We have the best coffee in the world” vs “Our estate earned the ‘world’s best coffee’ title at the Specialty Coffee Association of America’s Roasters Guild for the third year in a row.” Which claim is more believable?
You can use a superlative if you back it up.
Here’s an example. Can you understand what they offer?

Specific headline. Specific call to action with a specific explanation of what they get when they sign up. Specific benefits listed. Specific image to show the product in action.
It Has to Be About Them
Remember the old brain I mentioned before?
Our brains have three layers, and the oldest part—the old brain—is the decision-making part.
The “Old Brain” is the part that humans and their predecessors have had the longest—like 450 million years or so. So the part of the brain that controls decisions is fairly primitive and mostly concerned with survival.
If your copy is about you (your product, your company) and not the prospect (his problems, his life), you will fail. Make it about them. Too many companies start by stating “our company was founded…”, “we offer …” or something especially useless like “welcome to your website”.
Instead of saying “we specialize in dog training”, say “train your dog in two weeks”—move the focus from you to the benefit they will receive. People care about themselves—not you—and whether your website can be helpful in some way.
How Much Information Should I Provide?
Tests have shown that 79% of people don’t read, they just skim. However, 16% read everything.
Those 16% are your main target group, the most interested people. If people are not interested in what you are selling, it doesn’t matter how long or short your sales copy is. If they are interested, you should give them as much information as possible.
Complete information is the best sales copy. A study by IDC showed that 50% of the uncompleted purchases were due to lack of information. They can always skip parts and click the “buy” button once they have the information they need. But if they read through the whole thing and they’re still not convinced, then you have a problem.
This is why you should always strive to say everything that can possibly be said about your product. You cannot be there in person to explain and answer the questions, so your copy needs to do it for you.
All at Once or Make Them Click?
Long form copy works just great, but it’s not necessary to provide all the information on a single page. It’s okay to move supplemental information onto a different page (layer, popup, etc.) and just link to it.
For instance, Amazon often hides full technical information of products behind a link—since it’s only interesting to the hardcore tech savvy customers (and most customers are not).

Full technical details available after clicking a link.
The important thing is that all the information needed to make the decision is on a single page. Don’t make people work click to read stuff that you want them to read anyway (like features, benefits, testimonials, pricing, etc.).
When, Where and If at All Should I Show the Price?
Some people think that the price drives readers away, and they should hide it somehow—or make it hard to get to. While there is truth in that sometimes, it’s mostly false.
Consider this:
- People always want to know how much things cost.
- If you don’t publish the price, have a “get a quote” form instead. But if your competition does, they may get the client.
You should always make the price easy to find, but for more complex / expensive products communicate the value before the price.
Let’s say you’re selling a copper vase. Price: $990.
Seems expensive. But what if you knew that it was designed by Andy Warhol and previously used by Kurt Cobain? If you know who these people are and respect them, this changes everything, and it might seem like a steal instead.
So communicate value before price.
If your price is cheap, you want people to know it. If it’s expensive, the price qualifies the right people who are convinced to buy your copy. Giving price details also convinces your reader of the image and brand value of your product.
4. Conversion Boost
Once you have the content in place, it’s time to give it a conversion boost. The goal of the website copy is to convert the reader into a buyer (or subscriber, lead, etc.). There are certain things we can do to improve the conversion rate (the percentage of readers that take action) of the copy.
We’ll use three guides here to make the copy sell better:
- Conversion frameworks.
- Science of persuasion.
- Neuromarketing research.

Conversion boost. Image credit APM Alex.
Conversion Frameworks and Why They Matter
Conversion frameworks are a structured approach for increasing website conversion rates. The most prominent ones have been fine-tuned over the years and have been proven to boost sales.
While the conversion frameworks apply to a website as a whole, they can also be used as frameworks to improve sales copy.
There are many conversion frameworks around, let’s use one of them as an example:
C = 4m + 3v + 2(i-f) – 2a
This is not a lesson in physics, but a conversion formula developed by Marketing Experiments. Translation:
C = Probability of conversion
m = Motivation of user (when)
v = Clarity of the value proposition (why)
i = Incentive to take action
f = Friction elements of process
a = Anxiety about entering information
Summary: The probability of conversion depends on the match between the offer and visitor motivation + the clarity of the value proposition + (incentives to take action now—friction)—anxiety. The numbers next to each character signify the importance of them.
How to apply this to your copy:
- Is your value proposition easy to understand and perfectly clear? Would everyone understand what you offer and how it’s beneficial to them?
- Go through your copy and see if there’s any way to make your statements clearer.
- Communicate value: don’t just list features, turn them into benefits.
- Make a list of all possible questions, doubts and objections that prospects might have in the buying process. Address them.
- Make the buying or signup process as easy as possible, remove everything that is not absolutely necessary.
- Add microcopy: explain why you need certain data and what happens after they give it to you.
- Provide full information: what happens after they buy, what can they expect, when is the product shipped, what’s the delivery time.
- Add risk reversal: what kind of guarantees are in place? What happens if they don’t like it, or it’s not what they thought, etc?
The Science of Persuasion
Persuasion has been researched thoroughly. Mr. Cialdini is undoubtedly the biggest authority on the field. His books are bestsellers and have been on the “must-read” list for marketers and copywriters for years.
In his research, Cialdini came up with six scientific principles of persuasion that will help guide you to become more effective at getting people to do what you want. In case you’re not familiar with those principles, then here’s the summary:
Principle 1: Reciprocity
People feel obligated to give back to others who have given to them.
How to use it: teach your prospect something useful in your copy, give away free stuff, and better yet—add value to your prospects long before you even start to sell them something.
Principle 2: Liking
We prefer to say “yes” to those we know and like.
How to use it: talk/write like a human, connect with the reader, share details about yourself. Blog. Be friendly and cool (like Richard Branson, Oprah, Gary V).
Principle 3: Social Proof
People decide what’s appropriate for them to do in a situation by examining and following what others are doing.
How to use it: show how many others are already using your product. Show off your numbers. Use testimonials. Link to 3rd-party articles.
Principle 4: Authority
People rely on those with superior knowledge or perspective for guidance on how to respond AND what decisions to make.
How to use it: Demonstrate your expertise. Show off your resume and results. Get celebrity (in your niche) endorsements.
Principle 5: Consistency
Once we make a choice/take a stand, we will encounter personal and interpersonal pressure to behave consistently with that commitment.
How to use it: Start small and move up from there. Sell something small at first (a no-brainer deal), even if you make no money on it. They now see themselves as your customer, and will most likely return to make a larger purchase.
Principle 6: Scarcity
Opportunities appear more valuable when they are less available.
How to use it: Use time or quantity limited bonuses. Limit access to your product. Promote exclusivity.
What Neuromarketing Teaches Us
Research in neuromarketing (put together in this book) reveals interesting things about our brains.

Neuromarketing study in action. Image credit: SMI Eye Tracking.
We’re usually trying to talk to the “new brain”—the sophisticated one—but it’s the brute “old brain” that makes all the decisions, so we need to dumb it down. Here’s the formula for talking to the old brain:
Selling probability = Pain x Claim x Gain x (Old Brain)3
- First you need to identify the prospect’s pain and make sure they acknowledge the pain before you start to sell them anything. Then, you’ve got to differentiate your claims from your competitors. The strongest claim is the one that eliminates the strongest pain.
- Next, you have to show convincing proof to back the claims up. The “Old Brain” is resistant to new ideas and concepts, so your proof must be very convincing. Show tangible evidence, data, before & after comparisons, testimonials, and case studies.
- In order to reach the old brain, you need to start with a “grabber”—something that really gets the attention (“if you’re selling fire extinguishers, start with fire”, like Ogilvy said). Second—the “Old brain” is visual, so use a big picture to illustrate and reinforce your message. Visuals get to the brain much faster than words. Best visuals show contrast—before/after, beginning/end, then/now.
How to apply it to your copy:
- Start with a grabber—something that evokes emotion.
- Address the pain from the get-go.
- Use a big picture next to your value proposition, one that the prospect can identify with.
- Are your claims different from the competition?
- Add proof to your claims in all possible formats.
5. Revise And Rearrange
Done with conversion boosting? Now enjoy a full night of sleep and come back to the copy in the morning.
A fresh look a day later will help you spot inconsistencies, missing information, and flaws in the general flow of the copy. Use this time to add more information, rearrange the order of different blocks and fix the typos (spelling mistakes can cost you customers).
Before you publish the sales copy, it always pays to get two or three other people to read it and give you feedback. You want feedback from your ideal customers—do they get any questions that were left unanswered? Is there any part that needs to be made clearer? And peers—other marketers or entrepreneurs. What could make the offer better and more credible?
Once the editing is complete, you can make it live on your website. Don’t guess whether the headline or value propositions are as good as they can be, immediately launch two versions of the copy and test them.
6. Test
There is no good way to predict how well the copy will do. Sometimes the conversion rates can skyrocket overnight. Sometimes the new copy turns out to be a downright dud.

You need to test your copy. Image credit Horia Varlan.
Maybe it’s because the offer is weak. Perhaps the headline is the bottleneck. It’s impossible to put the finger on the problem as all you have are hypothesis. The only way to know is to test.
Don’t trust a copywriter who says he always writes killer copy on his first try. Nobody does.
Most common problems:
- Your value proposition is poor.
- The offer doesn’t match the audience’s needs.
- The headline is weak.
- It’s not clear how the visitor benefits from this.
Start with A/B testing value propositions, and go from there.
Conclusion
Writing great copy is a skill you have to learn just like anything else. Use the outline and the tips to get started on the right track. Stephen King, the famous writer, said that if you want to be a writer, you must do two things above all others: read a lot and write a lot. I believe the same goes for writing great copy.
The best Web copy is not the one that uses sophisticated persuasion and mind manipulation techniques. The best copy provides full information about the product, its benefits, and makes it clear whether it’s the right one for the user.
(jvb) (il)
© Peep Laja for Smashing Magazine, 2012.
Read More...
A Foot On The Bottom Rung: First Forays Into Responsive Web Development
Responsive design is the hottest topic in front-end Web development right now. It’s going to transform the Web into an all-singing, all-dancing, all-devices party, where we can access any information located anywhere in the world. But does responsive design translate well from the text-heavy Web design blogosphere to the cold hard reality of commercial systems?
Rumors came through our office grapevine that management was looking to revamp our mobile presence. There was talk of multiple apps being built externally that could be used on some of the major mobile devices. Our team had been getting familiar with responsive design and put forward a proposal of doing away with device-specific apps and developing a single responsive website that could be served to both desktop and mobile users. After a few hasty demos and prototypes, the idea was accepted and we began work.
The brief: make our current website, Airport-Hotels.uk, responsive while retaining the existing layout for users on browsers of 1000 pixels and up.
The following is what we picked up along the way.
Starting With Desktop Is OK
The general consensus now seems to be “mobile first.” I agree. Starting with a single(ish)-column mobile website is the easiest way to get your CSS off to a great start. However, we use an external design agency, so the time and cost of a new mobile-first design was not feasible. It was left to the front-end developer to translate the existing design onto screens of smaller dimensions.
The solution was to break up the website into smaller blocks (or nuggets), which could then be positioned differently as the browser’s width increased. This led to our first base media query, which contained the main branding elements, with minimal layout information. Because the nuggets were of a fairly fixed size, we had a foundation for creating a grid for each of our major media queries. Anything that wasn’t deemed to be a “nugget,” such as a larger block of text, would be responsive and fill in the gaps that the nuggets couldn’t.
While this method is not as good a practice as “mobile first,” it does have the advantage of being faster and cheaper than a full redesign. And you pick up great knowledge along the way for when resources do become available for something more substantial.
Less Is More
When getting your feet wet with media queries, you’re tempted to go all out, but do you need to? Theoretically, you could serve a completely different design to each device. While this would be spectacular and self-satisfying, maintaining it would be a nightmare. We ended up using the default media queries in Andy Clarke’s 320 and Up framework, containing four breakpoints (1382 pixels was not in the brief). Looking back now, we could have removed at least one of those queries, possibly two.
We’ve been gathering statistics in the weeks since the website’s release, and by far the majority of our customers are running browsers either of 320 × 480 pixels or on full desktops. We could hit over 85% of our user base by focusing on these resolutions, while cutting down on development time and maintenance.
This was especially evident on our availability page, which easily contains the most information of any of the pages in our booking flow. In the end, rather than try to serve the perfect design to each device width, we moved much of the CSS for the largest media query to the size below: less maintenance, less fuss, and more time to work on the UX (and, importantly to the business, to make bookings).
Ability Sniffing Is Not Enough
When I first saw tools like Modernizr, I thought they would change everything. I suppose they have, but don’t rely on them too much. Mobile browsers have more inconsistencies than any desktop I have ever seen. Even WebKit-based browsers can render things completely differently. With debugging tools at a minimum, it’s like we’ve been thrust back into the pre-developer toolbar era of IE bug fixing. Luckily, that’s one of my favorite things.
Exploring this strange new world of bugs became one of the major aspects of the project. A few of my favorites are highlighted below. Hopefully, they won’t trip you up.
CSS Columns
I love CSS columns. I had been wanting to use them for a while; but, other than small personal projects, nothing with appropriate content came up. While trying to work out the best layout for our website on a 320-pixel device, I realized that, rather than generating columns using floats or inline blocks, we could reduce the layout CSS to just a few lines by creating CSS columns. With most major mobile Web browsers being based on WebKit and Opera, this seemed to be a fairly reasonable solution and appeared to lay out everything perfectly. Great!
Here is the original code for the 320-pixel media query:
.product {
-moz-column-count: 2;
-moz-column-gap: 5px;
-webkit-column-count: 2;
-webkit-column-gap: 5px;
column-count: 2;
column-gap: 5px;
}
And here is the updated solution (roughly speaking — the actual code was much longer):
.product>div {
width: 49%;
float: left;
margin: 0.5%;
}
Unfortunately, the
specification isn’t quite ready yet. On BlackBerrys and some HTC Android phones, our form elements (specifically, the buttons) became unclickable. The layout was perfect — we checked that the CSS was accepted with Modernizr, and all the links worked — and yet you couldn’t click the “Book” button. Back to the drawing board with that one.
We ended up using a more standard float-based column layout.
CSS Gradients
Gradients were another excellent instance of browser idiosyncrasies. We used a lot of CSS gradients in this redevelopment to replace some images. This should have saved the user’s bandwidth and made redesigns and maintenance faster.
On WebOS (with a WebKit-based browser), though, CSS gradients would render as completely black unless used on a form input element. It was baffling. In the end, we figured out that it was a bug in the implementation of
. We’ve learned that the bug has been fixed in the upcoming version, so this might not be an issue in the future.
Here is the offending CSS:
.ppcHeader {
background: #73bff1; /* Old browsers */
background: -moz-linear-gradient(left, #73bff1 0%, #009ff7 100%); /* FF3.6+ */
background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, color-stop(0%,#73bff1), color-stop(100%,#009ff7)); /* Chrome,Safari4+ */
background: -webkit-linear-gradient(left, #73bff1 0%,#009ff7 100%); /* Chrome10+,Safari5.1+ */
background: -o-linear-gradient(left, #73bff1 0%,#009ff7 100%); /* Opera11.10+ */
background: -ms-linear-gradient(left, #73bff1 0%,#009ff7 100%); /* IE10+ */
background: linear-gradient(left, #73bff1 0%,#009ff7 100%); /* W3C */
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
(Bear in mind that CSS gradients add a heavy load to the browser’s rendering engine, so if you are using a lot of them, switching them off for mobile might be wise.)
JavaScript on BlackBerry 5.0 and Opera Mini
Basically, JavaScript does not work on Blackberry 5.0. BlackBerry tries, but it’s so inconsistent and buggy that it’s not worth it. We were reliably advised by Peter-Paul Kochs to just resort to device sniffing and to turn off any JavaScript. This is another reason to make sure your websites are progressively enhanced by falling back to non-JavaScript versions.
Meanwhile, Opera Mini works fine with JavaScript, but each of a website’s pages is rendered on Opera’s servers and then essentially compressed into a big image before being sent to the mobile device. This is great for the user because it can reduce bandwidth to 10% of the normal browsing experience. On the other hand, if you have
validation in your forms, this can be a problem because each call to the JavaScript would require refreshing the entire page from the server.
Forms Drop Users
This was and still is one of the major problems with mobile browsing on our e-commerce website. In order to make a purchase on an average website, the user has to fill in a lot of information: names, addresses, credit-card details, the list goes on and on. While typing on mobile has gotten much easier, navigating large forms is a frustrating and laborious process.
Our mockup payment page had 22 form inputs that needed some kind of interaction. These were required either to make a successful booking, to provide information to the product supplier after booking or for our own sales and data purposes.
The question became (as it always seems to be with mobile), what could we remove and what did we have to keep? Well, we tried to take the middle path, which is currently in development or might even be live by the time you read this.
We chose to split our payment process into two stages. Because our users can save more on their purchase by booking early, our first payment stage asks for the very minimum of information required in order to confirm a booking: name, car registration and credit-card details. This gives the user the best price available and chalks up another booking for us. Part two of the payment process is to gather the rest of the information required to “complete” the booking. This second stage can be filled out at the user’s convenience, either immediately or later on using our online booking management system. This eases any frustration caused by having to fill out a large form.
Good UI != Good UI
A good user interface means something completely different on mobile devices — and even tablets for that matter. Many of the user-friendly features we have implemented on our desktop website would just be bad ideas on these smaller mouse-less devices.
Lightboxes
Lightboxes were all the rage a few years ago. They were a convenient and pretty way to display a small amount of content or something that wasn’t worth loading a new page for. In IE 7 and up, you can position lightboxes using
, which is great. On mobile devices, though, browsers do not implement
, or they implement it in an odd way to prevent non-mobile-ready websites from not working at all. This will ruin any lightboxes.
We recommend just loading a new page for lightbox content: less JavaScript, easier and fast. A new tab would also be fine, but due to the infancy of tabbed browsing on mobile devices, maintaining the flow is probably a better idea for now.
Hovers
Content that is only visible via hovering obviously doesn’t work on touchscreens. What used to be an easy way to hide content while keeping it accessible has become a bit of a nightmare to deal with. We tried just removing the hover and showing the content, to see what would happen. The iPhone actually handles hovers fairly well, translating them into tap events. On Android, you need to click and hold for a little while to prevent the default action of clicking the link (our links are anchor-tag-based).
In the end, modifying the code that handles the hovers (assuming it’s JavaScript) and adding a tap event seemed to be the best solution. This allowed us to preserve the design’s aesthetic, while keeping as much functionality as possible for mobile users.
if( document.createTouch ) {
this.addEvent(c[j],'tap',this.tipOver,false);
} else {
this.addEvent(c[j],'mouseover',this.tipOver,false);
this.addEvent(c[j],'mouseout',this.tipOut,false);
}
Date Picker
Our date-picker calendar was one of the biggest hurdles to overcome in the UI. We have a text input that allows the user to enter a date. Prior to the date-picker, our solution was a dynamically generated select box, but that caused confusion among many users because they might have remembered the day of the week they were flying on but not the date. So, we added the jQuery UI Datepicker to make filling in the search form one step easier.
However, what was one step forward for convenience on the desktop was one step back on mobile. Focusing the text input would open both the date picker and the phone’s keyboard, thus obscuring the date picker.
Our next option was to use the HTML5 date input. Because this element was released so recently, browsers are still playing catch up, and implementations vary wildly. It’s just as rough on desktop, with Firefox still rendering it as a text input, Chrome adds an up/down selector and forces the date format, while Opera actually renders a calendar just like the jQuery UI Datepicker. This solution still requires the date-picker JavaScript, but it forces the format, which can actually make it less user-friendly. While the concept is great and the solution will be great once the bugs are ironed out, we found that the date type input is not yet ready for commercial use in this fashion.
Our eventual solution (not yet live) was to use a JavaScript “touch event” query to generate a more mobile-friendly date picker than the standard jQuery UI one. This creates an iOS-styled triple drop-down menu for day, month and year and is user-friendly on mobile devices. The no-JavaScript backup can be either a text input or a select drop-down menu. Have a look at the code for yourself.
Fix IE First
The final point, which reflects the complexity of mobile development, is how to fit old versions of IE into this new technology. IE 8 and below ignores media queries, which presents a rather sticky problem when your entire website is based on them. There are several solutions to this, which we’ll explore below.
JavaScript Polyfills
I can think of two great JavaScript polyfill options for media queries. The first is Respond.js, which continually monitors the browser’s width, parses the CSS and then serves the correct styles for that width. This is a great solution if you need the website to respond on IE 8 and below. The main issue is the time between the document loading and the JavaScript kicking in; the website is initially displayed using the base style sheet, usually the mobile view, before it “jumps” to the full desktop version. Obviously, this doesn’t look great on a desktop monitor, and if the user is on an old browser, then their computer and Internet connection will probably be slow, too, which means that the jump time could be even longer.
The other JavaScript option here is the Chrome frame, which achieves the same end and has the same disadvantages. This solution isn’t bad, but just not right for our implementation.
Include All Media Queries
This is one of my favorite options for responsive websites and is also used in the latest version of the 320 and Up boilerplate. Create a separate CSS file for each device width; and for IE, serve them all to the user, with no media queries. With a mobile-first approach and a couple of fixed widths in your IE style sheet, this will serve the full-sized version of the website to users of outdated browsers. This solution is fast, simple and easy to maintain.
A Separate IE Style Sheet Entirely
Finally, given the right conditions, you could just write a completely separate IE style sheet, full of conditional comments to load the full desktop version of the website. Theoretically, this need only contain small amounts of layout information; but given that many of these styles will be reproduced in your media queries for wider widths, it can cause maintenance issues down the line. Duplicating code is never a good idea, which makes me wary of this solution.
Interestingly, we used this solution in the end, but with a twist. We used a PHP plugin in our template files to combine, compress and cache our CSS files. Due to some issues with the cache in IE, we were already generating a separate cached CSS file for IE users. We added a couple of lines to the PHP file to strip out media queries entirely as it combines and compresses the CSS. This method delivers the results of the “include all media queries” solution, while allowing the option for inline media queries in the style sheet. Because of the way we organized the CSS, this turned out to be the best solution for the project.
Conclusion
After all that, we finally have the first version of our responsive booking flow. I like to think that this epitomizes “mobile-ready.” We aren’t necessarily mobile-optimized, but our feet are on the bottom rung of a tall ladder that climbs to a great system that works perfectly on all devices. This is the starting point, if you will.
Was it worth it? It’s been a long journey, with a lot of head scratching and learning on our feet fast, but that’s what Web development is about, and I wouldn’t have it any other way. You can’t be perfect the first time round, and you don’t have to be. The point is that this technology is ready now, and the sooner you start using it, the better prepared you’ll be for the mobile market as it comes running at you. In the next few years, we’re hoping to see JavaScript network APIs that will allow Web users to add purchases directly to their monthly phone bill. I expect the mobile e-commerce market will explode at that point. Will you be ready?
(al) (da) (il)
© Gavyn McKenzie for Smashing Magazine, 2012.
Read More...
Critics of Organic Content Farms like Demand Media Should Eat Their Own Words
A year ago, I stuck my neck out and defended Demand Media’s approach to developing great content down on the content farm. Last week, I felt vindicated when Demand Media reported financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and raised its previously issued fiscal 2012 financial guidance.
Richard Rosenblatt, Chairman and CEO of Demand Media, in a press release, “We are pleased with our first quarter results and remain focused on investing in our long-term growth initiatives.” These include enhancing the quality of Demand Media’s Owned & Operated properties as well as expanding its content distribution channels and partnerships.
Demand Media: Success on Multiple Fronts
On a consolidated basis, Demand Media ranked as a top 20 US web property throughout the first quarter of 2012, ranking as #18 in March 2012, according to comScore. Demand Media’s worldwide unique users exceeded 104 million in March 2012.- On a standalone basis, eHow.com ranked as the #17 website in the US in March 2012, up from #19 in July 2011.
- LIVESTRONG.COM/eHow Health continued to rank as the #3 Health property in the US based on unique visits throughout the first quarter of 2012. In May 2012, LIVESTRONG.COM won the People’s Voice Webby award for Health Websites.
- Cracked.com continued its ranking as the most visited humor site in the US throughout the first quarter of 2012, and more time was spent on the site than any other humor website. In May 2012, Cracked.com won the People’s Voice Webby award for Humor Websites.
- In February 2012, Demand Media introduced its innovative Social Feed ads, which allow advertisers to deliver customized social media content directly into their live rich media ads.
- In March 2012, Demand Media launched the eHow.com Tech channel, with RadioShack as its lead sponsor, to help users master everyday tech-related tasks and projects.
- In April 2012, Demand Media launched eHow Pets, the third major channel in its partnership with YouTube.
Demand Media & YouTube = 7 Figure Revenue Success
Demand Media also has a number of YouTube channels, including Expert Village, eHow, LiveStrong, Cracked, Trails, Golflink, and TypeF. According to comScore Video Metrix YouTube partner data for February 2012, Demand Media had more than 6.8 million unique U.S. viewers, who watched over 17.4 million videos for an average of 9.5 minutes per viewer.
Demand Media has been a YouTube Partner since 2007, and by January 2009, advertising had become “a seven figure revenue stream,” according to Steven Kydd, EVP of Demand Studios, Demand Media’s content creation division. Today, Demand Media’s channels on YouTube had more than 2.8 billion total upload views:
- Expert Village’s channel has over 2.4 billion views.
eHow’s channel has 173.6 million views.- LiveStrong’s channel has 51.3 million views.
- eHow Espanol’s new channel already has 49.1 million views.
- eHow Dance’s new channel already has 29.8 million views.
- eHow Fitness’ new channel already has 23.8 million views.
- eHow Style’s new channel already has 17.3 million views.
- Cracked’s channel has 15.9 million views.
- eHow Food’s new channel already has 14.9 million views.
- eHow Tech’s new channel already has 14.2 million views.
- eHow Home’s new channel already has 9.2 million views.
- Golflink’s channel has 6.9 million views.
- Trails’s channel has 4.4 million views.
- eHow Pets’ new channel already has 2.5 million views.
- TypeF | Signature Series’ channel has 2.2 million views.
- eHow Money’s new channel already has 1.8 million views.
So, I think the critics of organic content farms like Demand Media should eat their own words.
What Exactly is a Content Farm?
These critics called Demand Media a “content farm,” like that’s inherently a bad thing. But, according to Wikipedia,
“In the context of the World Wide Web, a content farm (or content mill) is a company that employs large numbers of often freelance writers to generate large amounts of textual content which is specifically designed to satisfy algorithms for maximal retrieval by automated search engines.”
Using that definition, The Huffington Post – which was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in National Reporting last month – is also a content farm. Don’t believe me? Check out Clair Cain Miller article in The New York Times entitled, “Web Words That Lure the Readers.”
So, who exactly is harmed by companies that employ large numbers of “freelance” writers? And what is so bad about generating large amounts of content which is specifically designed to “lure” readers?
If you ask me, today’s critics of content farms are like the old critics of “yellow journalism.” Back in the 1880s and 1890s, Joseph Pulitzer hired women reporters like Nelly Bly, cut the price of the New York World to a penny, and added bolder headlines, more prominent illustrations, sports pages, women’s sections, personal advice columns, and comic strips. One comic strip featured a street urchin in a yellow shirt, and a hostile critic coined the term, “yellow journalism,” as a damning label for this kind of high-voltage content.
Today, virtually all newspapers have hired women reporters and adopted bold headlines, prominent illustrations, sports pages, women’s sections, personal advice columns, and comic strips. And they’d be honored if one of their text reporters, photographers, videographers, graphic artists, producers, or journalists won a Pulitzer Prize.
So, yesterday’s yellow journalism is today’s award-winning journalism.
“News” vs. Instructional “How-To” Content
So, why are journalists so afraid of content farms?
According to Google Insights for Search, web search interest in “news” has remained flat from 2004 to the present, while web search interest in “how to” has increased steadily. Most reporters, producers, and journalists are creating “news” stories while many freelance writers are creating “how to” articles.
And according to Compete PRO, eHow.com had 46.3 million unique visitors in March 2012, up 68.4% from 27.5 million in March 2010. By comparison, NYTimes.com had 16.8 million unique visitors in March 2012, down 5.6% from 17.8 million in March 2010.
So, I expect many of today’s critics of content farms will begin developing their own how-to content in the near future, start recruiting freelance writers to create it, or beat a path to Demand Media’s door to get their own Content Channels like USA TODAY’s “Travel Tips.” If they don’t, they’ll be yesterday’s news.
Read More...












